_Swap() is defined in nano_internal.h. Everything calls _Swap().
Pretty much nothing that called _Swap() included nano_internal.h,
expecting it to be picked up automatically through other headers (as
it happened, from the kernel arch-specific include file). A new
_Swap() is going to need some other symbols in the inline definition,
so I needed to break that cycle. Now nothing sees _Swap() defined
anymore. Put nano_internal.h everywhere it's needed.
Our kernel includes remain a big awful yucky mess. This makes things
more correct but no less ugly. Needs cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
When k_poll is being used k_queue_cancel_wait shall mark the state as
K_POLL_STATE_NOT_READY so other threads will get properly notified with
a NULL pointer return.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
k_queue_get shall never return NULL when timeout is K_FOREVER which can
happen when a higher priority thread cancel/take an item before the
waiting thread.
Fixes issue #4358
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
All sys_slist_*() functions aren't threadsafe and calls to them
must be protected with irq_lock. This is usually done in a wider
caller context, but k_queue_poll() is called with irq_lock already
relinquished, and is thus subject to hard to detect and explain
race conditions, as e.g. was tracked in #4022.
Signed-off-by: Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org>
This is necessary in order for k_queue_get to work properly since that
is used with buffer pools which might be used by multiple threads asking
for buffers.
Jira: ZEP-2553
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
This makes use of POLL_EVENT in case k_poll is enabled which is
preferable over wait_q as that allows objects to be removed for the
data_q at any time.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Fixes sparse warnings:
<snip>/zephyr/kernel/timer.c:15:16: warning: symbol '_trace_list_k_timer' was not declared. Should it be static?
<snip>/zephyr/kernel/sem.c:32:14: warning: symbol'_trace_list_k_sem' was not declared. Should it be static?
<snip>/zephyr/kernel/stack.c:24:16: warning: symbol '_trace_list_k_stack' was not declared. Should it be static?
<snip>/zephyr/kernel/queue.c:27:16: warning: symbol '_trace_list_k_queue' was not declared. Should it be static?
<snip>/zephyr/kernel/pipes.c:40:15: warning: symbol '_trace_list_k_pipe' was not declared. Should it be static?
<snip>/zephyr/kernel/mutex.c:46:16: warning: symbol '_trace_list_k_mutex' was not declared. Should it be static?
<snip>/zephyr/kernel/msg_q.c:26:15: warning: symbol '_trace_list_k_msgq' was not declared. Should it be static?
<snip>/zephyr/kernel/mem_slab.c:20:19: warning: symbol '_trace_list_k_mem_slab' was not declared. Should it be static?
<snip>/zephyr/kernel/mailbox.c:53:15: warning: symbol '_trace_list_k_mbox' was not declared. Should it be static?
Change-Id: I42d55aea9855b9c1dd560852ca033c9a19f1ac21
Signed-off-by: Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@gmail.com>
Currently, a queue/fifo getter chooses how long to wait for an
element. But there are scenarios when putter would know better,
there should be a way to expire getter's timeout to make it run
again. k_queue_cancel_wait() and k_fifo_cancel_wait() functions
do just that. They cause corresponding *_get() functions to return
with NULL value, as if timeout expired on getter's side (even
K_FOREVER).
This can be used to signal out of band conditions from putter to
getter, e.g. end of processing, error, configuration change, etc.
A specific event would be communicated to getter by other means
(e.g. using existing shared context structures).
Without this call, achieving the same effect would require e.g.
calling k_fifo_put() with a pointer to a special sentinal memory
structure - such structure would need to be allocated somewhere
and somehow, and getter would need to recognize it from a normal
data item. Having cancel_wait() functions offers an elegant
alternative. From this perspective, these calls can be seen as
an equivalent to e.g. k_fifo_put(fifo, NULL), except that such
call won't work in practice.
Change-Id: I47b7f690dc325a80943082bcf5345c41649e7024
Signed-off-by: Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org>
Convert code to use u{8,16,32,64}_t and s{8,16,32,64}_t instead of C99
integer types. This handles the remaining includes and kernel, plus
touching up various points that we skipped because of include
dependancies. We also convert the PRI printf formatters in the arch
code over to normal formatters.
Jira: ZEP-2051
Change-Id: Iecbb12601a3ee4ea936fd7ddea37788a645b08b0
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org>
This unifies k_fifo and k_lifo APIs thus making it more flexible regarding
where the data elements are inserted.
Change-Id: Icd6e2f62fc8b374c8273bb763409e9e22c40f9f8
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
