moving the conversion from adc value to the get function
which will be used for different handling of stm32 temp sensors
Signed-off-by: Wouter Cappelle <wouter.cappelle@crodeon.com>
The dts binding general rules document states that the property
description should explain why the default value was selected
(e.g. "default is the value at power-on").
See comment in #41143
Signed-off-by: Armando Visconti <armando.visconti@st.com>
Ensure that cpu1 only has its image load offset and flash size changed
if BUILD_WITH_TFM is selected, to prevent the flash size being changed
when TFM_BL2=n because TFM dependencies are not met.
Fixes#41127
Signed-off-by: Daniel DeGrasse <daniel.degrasse@nxp.com>
Provides interface, data structures and demuxing capability for ISO RX
PDU allocation and transport from LLL to HCI.
Uses the RXFIFO composite for simplicity and reduced overhead.
Signed-off-by: Morten Priess <mtpr@oticon.com>
This adds the necessary API calls to support the hardware feature of
suspending and resuming active DMA channels. The hardware feature is
supported by at least Synopsys's DesignWare DMA and NXP's eDMA.
Signed-off-by: Tom Burdick <thomas.burdick@intel.com>
The overall code coverage report of mps2_an385 was blocked by the
tests/net/lib/coap, the error message shows "No Mem available to
continue dump". So we enlarge the gcov heap size to prevent this
situation, try to make the report can be generated at least.
Signed-off-by: Enjia Mai <enjia.mai@intel.com>
Just minor styling changes to capitalize the first character
and removing the trailing comma on the brief doc description
on two copy functions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
Doxygen treats "/**" as documentation even if the comment block
is inside the function. So remove the extra asterisk for those
"TESTPOINT" comments.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
For functions returning nothing, there is no need to document
with @return, as Doxgen complains about "documented empty
return type of ...".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
Validate the OACP and OLCP procedure sizes as the procedure is parsed.
This is in contrast with the current implementation which first parses
the procedure and then validates its size and is prone to accessing
invalid memory when the procedure is malformed.
Signed-off-by: Abe Kohandel <abe.kohandel@gmail.com>
Add a way to filter scan results by name and/or
address. The idea is that this can be further expanded
by also scanning the content for specific UUIDs, PHY,
RSSI, etc.
This is particularly useful for cases where there are many
devices advertising at once.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>