The net_buf was always initialized with net_buf_simple_init_with_data
which was a bit wasteful as we only need to do that once. Since `inst`
is `static`ally allocated, we can check for `.data == NULL`.
Additionally the read callbacks expect the buffer to be 0-initialized
between each usage, which wasn't the case. We can use the `buf.len`
to determine how many bytes we need to reset to `0`.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The current way of setting the public address using
`bt_hci_driver_api::setup` does not work well in split builds
where host and controller runs on different cores/socs/boards.
This approach requires each HCI driver and each `hci_<transport>`
application to implement the setup and pass the information on
to the next layer.
Zephyr already defines a vendor-specific command that can be used
to set the public address (`bt_hci_cp_vs_write_bd_addr`).
Use this in `bt_enable` after opening the HCI transport and before
initializing the id module. This makes the setup independent of
hci transport and only depends on a controller that implements the
Zephyr HCI VS commands.
Signed-off-by: Herman Berget <herman.berget@nordicsemi.no>
The static global UUID variable in the GATT shell module was shared across
all concurrent discover and read-by-uuid operations, creating a potential
race condition where one operation could overwrite the UUID before another
completed. Move UUID storage into the per-operation gatt_op_context
structure to isolate UUID state for each operation. This enables safe
concurrent operations without data corruption.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Kosenko <Evgenii.Kosenko@silabs.com>
The friendly name buffer sizes used the URI length, but since
the friendly name is specifically not an URI that did not make
sense. Added a new Kconfig option to configure the maximum
supported friendly name, which is shared between both TBS
and the TBS client, similar to the other max Kconfig options.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
This commit does the following 2 changes:
1) The return value of k_mutex_lock has been modified to
be treated as a fatal error instead of a simple runtime error.
The reason for this is to avoid having to handle those cases,
and to treat those cases a fatal errors. The timeout for the
mutex should be long enough for any operation within the lock,
and if it isn't, then that should be treated as something that
needs to be fixed, as it is likely a bug. This is also the reason
why the timeout was kept, instead of using K_FOREVER.
2) Ensure that all log statements are done while the log isn't
locked.
The implementation should be reconsidered in terms of application
callbacks, as the current state, where we need to unlock and relock
the mutex so many times does not only risk resolving in cases where
wrong values are set, but is also not very readable nor performant.
Changes to the API will be done in a followup commit, as that requires
more significant changes.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
When an unicast initiator procedure or a commander broadcast
procedure is completed and we have handover enabled, the
parameters used need to be cleared before continueing.
This is due to the fact that the parameters are only cleared
on completion, rather than at initialization, and that the
initiator and commander parameters are in a union.
Not clearing the parameters could set some values to an
unknown/unexpected start value.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
Add a user_data field to bt_ccp_call_control_client_cb. The
field is optional to enable via Kconfig. The field can be used
to provide additional context from the owner of the callback
structure, to the callbacks themselves.
This solves a memory use-after-free issue in the unit tests
where the values from the callback was accessed after they
were released, as the values were just stack allocated.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
The usage of CHECKIF has been replaced with a regular
if. The reason for this is that higher layer may depend
on some of the checks defined by the API, and the higher
layers cannot do that properly if the checks can be
removed via a Kconfig option.
Signed-off-by: Emil Gydesen <emil.gydesen@nordicsemi.no>
Rename variable 'ret' to 'err' in cmd_send_media() to align with
Zephyr coding conventions for error return values.
Signed-off-by: Mark Wang <yichang.wang@nxp.com>
