It may be useful for the app to know what the initial NetKeyIndex that
it was given during provisioning is.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
This is in anticipation of soon adding health client support, which
could then cause confusion due to the ambiguous API names.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Now that there's support for configuration client as well, rename cfg
to cfg_srv to avoid any confusion.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Add the ability to track the provisioning bearer through an extra
parameter to link_open/close. Also introduce new public functions to
enable/disable specific provisioning bearers. This also means that one
now needs to explicitly enable provisioning bearers after calling
bt_mesh_init().
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Add commands for 1-byte states such as Default TTL, Friend and GATT
Proxy, as well as the 2-byte Relay state.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Add support to the Configuration Client Model for getting and setting
1-byte states (which can be nicely generalized in code) as well as the
2-byte Relay state.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
This patch adds read permission for client characteristic configuration
descriptor. This is required by MESH/NODE/MPS/BV-06-C,
MESH/NODE/MPS/BV-07-C PTS tests.
Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Kolodziejczyk <grzegorz.kolodziejczyk@codecoup.pl>
Add a basic shell skeleton for Mesh, containing basic command for
initialization, provisioning and reset.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The restoring of the buffer parsing state was only correct for the
friend queue (which needs the app-layer data). Relaying on the other
hand requires the network layer data, i.e. it needs a different state
to be restored.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
We never access the local network interface queue in a blocking
fashing, so it's unnecessary to have all the infrastructure that
k_fifo provides. Use the simpler sys_slist_t instead.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
It may be useful for the app to know when the provisioning link is
active and when it has been closed. This can be used e.g. to signal
the user the state of the device. Some PTS tests also require
verifying the link state.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The code was missing the sending of the Input Complete PDU, and was
also setting the link.auth value too late.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The parameter structs for advertising and scanning contain many
members that may not get explicitly set when enabling these states. Do
a memset to zero on them to make sure we don't operate on
uninitialized memory.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
A value of 20ms means it's possible the LPN will end up doing
simultaneous advertising & scanning, which increases the risk of lost
packets. Use a default of 100ms to keep these separate.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Handling Friend Clear messages and sending the Friend Clear
Confirmation responses wasn't so far properly implemented. One of the
requirements is to keep sending the reponses even though we no-longer
have a friendship. This means that we need to keep the net_idx, frnd
and lpn_counter values valid, which in turn requires the introduction
of a separate "valid" boolean value.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The PTS tests for the Friend node expect a minimum of 16 queued
messages and the ability to have two LPNs. Set these as defaults.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
When sending PDUs from Friend to LPN we should adhere to the
configured network transmit count & interval to get better
reliability for the PDUs to be received by the LPN.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
When a Friend Node receives a Friend Request with a unicast
PreviousAddress that's not an element on the Friend Node, it needs to
start the Friend Clear procedure. This procedure involves sending
periodic Friend Clear messages to the old Friend of the LPN.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
The only messages that should be encrypted using the friendship
credentials are those coming through the Friend Queue on the Friend
node, most request-response pairs between LPN & Friend (exceptions are
Friend Request - Friend Offer, and Friend Clear - Friend Clear
Confirm), as well as Model Publication messages when the Friendship
Credentials Flag has been enabled in the model publication.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
When the node is in LPN node, the LPN-Friend messages has its own
retries, so doing this on the advertising level (i.e. following the
network transmit state) is sub-optimal.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
This makes it possible (in a subsequent patch) to fine-tune some
special cases, like the LPN poll messages.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>