zephyr/arch/riscv/core/thread.c

193 lines
5.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/*
* Copyright (c) 2016 Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
* Copyright (c) 2020 BayLibre, SAS
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
*/
#include <zephyr/kernel.h>
headers: Refactor kernel and arch headers. This commit refactors kernel and arch headers to establish a boundary between private and public interface headers. The refactoring strategy used in this commit is detailed in the issue This commit introduces the following major changes: 1. Establish a clear boundary between private and public headers by removing "kernel/include" and "arch/*/include" from the global include paths. Ideally, only kernel/ and arch/*/ source files should reference the headers in these directories. If these headers must be used by a component, these include paths shall be manually added to the CMakeLists.txt file of the component. This is intended to discourage applications from including private kernel and arch headers either knowingly and unknowingly. - kernel/include/ (PRIVATE) This directory contains the private headers that provide private kernel definitions which should not be visible outside the kernel and arch source code. All public kernel definitions must be added to an appropriate header located under include/. - arch/*/include/ (PRIVATE) This directory contains the private headers that provide private architecture-specific definitions which should not be visible outside the arch and kernel source code. All public architecture- specific definitions must be added to an appropriate header located under include/arch/*/. - include/ AND include/sys/ (PUBLIC) This directory contains the public headers that provide public kernel definitions which can be referenced by both kernel and application code. - include/arch/*/ (PUBLIC) This directory contains the public headers that provide public architecture-specific definitions which can be referenced by both kernel and application code. 2. Split arch_interface.h into "kernel-to-arch interface" and "public arch interface" divisions. - kernel/include/kernel_arch_interface.h * provides private "kernel-to-arch interface" definition. * includes arch/*/include/kernel_arch_func.h to ensure that the interface function implementations are always available. * includes sys/arch_interface.h so that public arch interface definitions are automatically included when including this file. - arch/*/include/kernel_arch_func.h * provides architecture-specific "kernel-to-arch interface" implementation. * only the functions that will be used in kernel and arch source files are defined here. - include/sys/arch_interface.h * provides "public arch interface" definition. * includes include/arch/arch_inlines.h to ensure that the architecture-specific public inline interface function implementations are always available. - include/arch/arch_inlines.h * includes architecture-specific arch_inlines.h in include/arch/*/arch_inline.h. - include/arch/*/arch_inline.h * provides architecture-specific "public arch interface" inline function implementation. * supersedes include/sys/arch_inline.h. 3. Refactor kernel and the existing architecture implementations. - Remove circular dependency of kernel and arch headers. The following general rules should be observed: * Never include any private headers from public headers * Never include kernel_internal.h in kernel_arch_data.h * Always include kernel_arch_data.h from kernel_arch_func.h * Never include kernel.h from kernel_struct.h either directly or indirectly. Only add the kernel structures that must be referenced from public arch headers in this file. - Relocate syscall_handler.h to include/ so it can be used in the public code. This is necessary because many user-mode public codes reference the functions defined in this header. - Relocate kernel_arch_thread.h to include/arch/*/thread.h. This is necessary to provide architecture-specific thread definition for 'struct k_thread' in kernel.h. - Remove any private header dependencies from public headers using the following methods: * If dependency is not required, simply omit * If dependency is required, - Relocate a portion of the required dependencies from the private header to an appropriate public header OR - Relocate the required private header to make it public. This commit supersedes #20047, addresses #19666, and fixes #3056. Signed-off-by: Stephanos Ioannidis <root@stephanos.io>
2019-10-25 00:08:21 +09:00
#include <ksched.h>
#include <zephyr/arch/riscv/csr.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <pmp.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_USERSPACE
/*
* Per-thread (TLS) variable indicating whether execution is in user mode.
*/
__thread uint8_t is_user_mode;
#endif
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
void arch_new_thread(struct k_thread *thread, k_thread_stack_t *stack,
kernel: overhaul stack specification The core kernel computes the initial stack pointer for a thread, properly aligning it and subtracting out any random offsets or thread-local storage areas. arch_new_thread() no longer needs to make any calculations, an initial stack frame may be placed at the bounds of the new 'stack_ptr' parameter passed in. This parameter replaces 'stack_size'. thread->stack_info is now set before arch_new_thread() is invoked, z_new_thread_init() has been removed. The values populated may need to be adjusted on arches which carve-out MPU guard space from the actual stack buffer. thread->stack_info now has a new member 'delta' which indicates any offset applied for TLS or random offset. It's used so the calculations don't need to be repeated if the thread later drops to user mode. CONFIG_INIT_STACKS logic is now performed inside z_setup_new_thread(), before arch_new_thread() is called. thread->stack_info is now defined as the canonical user-accessible area within the stack object, including random offsets and TLS. It will never include any carved-out memory for MPU guards and must be updated at runtime if guards are removed. Available stack space is now optimized. Some arches may need to significantly round up the buffer size to account for page-level granularity or MPU power-of-two requirements. This space is now accounted for and used by virtue of the Z_THREAD_STACK_SIZE_ADJUST() call in z_setup_new_thread. Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
2020-04-23 13:55:56 -07:00
char *stack_ptr, k_thread_entry_t entry,
void *p1, void *p2, void *p3)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
{
extern void z_riscv_thread_start(void);
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
struct __esf *stack_init;
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE
const struct soc_esf soc_esf_init = {SOC_ESF_INIT};
#endif
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/* Initial stack frame for thread */
stack_init = (struct __esf *)Z_STACK_PTR_ALIGN(
Z_STACK_PTR_TO_FRAME(struct __esf, stack_ptr)
);
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/* Setup the initial stack frame */
stack_init->a0 = (unsigned long)entry;
stack_init->a1 = (unsigned long)p1;
stack_init->a2 = (unsigned long)p2;
stack_init->a3 = (unsigned long)p3;
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/*
* Following the RISC-V architecture,
* the MSTATUS register (used to globally enable/disable interrupt),
* as well as the MEPC register (used to by the core to save the
* value of the program counter at which an interrupt/exception occurs)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
* need to be saved on the stack, upon an interrupt/exception
* and restored prior to returning from the interrupt/exception.
* This shall allow to handle nested interrupts.
*
* Given that thread startup happens through the exception exit
* path, initially set:
* 1) MSTATUS to MSTATUS_DEF_RESTORE in the thread stack to enable
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
* interrupts when the newly created thread will be scheduled;
* 2) MEPC to the address of the z_thread_entry in the thread
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
* stack.
* Hence, when going out of an interrupt/exception/context-switch,
* after scheduling the newly created thread:
* 1) interrupts will be enabled, as the MSTATUS register will be
* restored following the MSTATUS value set within the thread stack;
* 2) the core will jump to z_thread_entry, as the program
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
* counter will be restored following the MEPC value set within the
* thread stack.
*/
stack_init->mstatus = MSTATUS_DEF_RESTORE;
#if defined(CONFIG_FPU_SHARING)
/* thread birth happens through the exception return path */
thread->arch.exception_depth = 1;
#elif defined(CONFIG_FPU)
/* Unshared FP mode: enable FPU of each thread. */
stack_init->mstatus |= MSTATUS_FS_INIT;
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_USERSPACE)
/* Clear user thread context */
z_riscv_pmp_usermode_init(thread);
thread->arch.priv_stack_start = 0;
#endif /* CONFIG_USERSPACE */
/* Assign thread entry point and mstatus.MPRV mode. */
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USERSPACE)
&& (thread->base.user_options & K_USER)) {
/* User thread */
stack_init->mepc = (unsigned long)k_thread_user_mode_enter;
} else {
/* Supervisor thread */
stack_init->mepc = (unsigned long)z_thread_entry;
#if defined(CONFIG_PMP_STACK_GUARD)
/* Enable PMP in mstatus.MPRV mode for RISC-V machine mode
* if thread is supervisor thread.
*/
stack_init->mstatus |= MSTATUS_MPRV;
#endif /* CONFIG_PMP_STACK_GUARD */
}
#if defined(CONFIG_PMP_STACK_GUARD)
/* Setup PMP regions of PMP stack guard of thread. */
z_riscv_pmp_stackguard_prepare(thread);
#endif /* CONFIG_PMP_STACK_GUARD */
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE
stack_init->soc_context = soc_esf_init;
#endif
thread->callee_saved.sp = (unsigned long)stack_init;
/* where to go when returning from z_riscv_switch() */
thread->callee_saved.ra = (unsigned long)z_riscv_thread_start;
/* our switch handle is the thread pointer itself */
thread->switch_handle = thread;
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
}
#ifdef CONFIG_USERSPACE
/*
* User space entry function
*
* This function is the entry point to user mode from privileged execution.
* The conversion is one way, and threads which transition to user mode do
* not transition back later, unless they are doing system calls.
*/
FUNC_NORETURN void arch_user_mode_enter(k_thread_entry_t user_entry,
void *p1, void *p2, void *p3)
{
unsigned long top_of_user_stack, top_of_priv_stack;
unsigned long status;
/* Set up privileged stack */
#ifdef CONFIG_GEN_PRIV_STACKS
_current->arch.priv_stack_start =
(unsigned long)z_priv_stack_find(_current->stack_obj);
/* remove the stack guard from the main stack */
_current->stack_info.start -= K_THREAD_STACK_RESERVED;
_current->stack_info.size += K_THREAD_STACK_RESERVED;
#else
_current->arch.priv_stack_start = (unsigned long)_current->stack_obj;
#endif /* CONFIG_GEN_PRIV_STACKS */
top_of_priv_stack = Z_STACK_PTR_ALIGN(_current->arch.priv_stack_start +
K_KERNEL_STACK_RESERVED +
CONFIG_PRIVILEGED_STACK_SIZE);
top_of_user_stack = Z_STACK_PTR_ALIGN(
_current->stack_info.start +
_current->stack_info.size -
_current->stack_info.delta);
status = csr_read(mstatus);
/* Set next CPU status to user mode */
status = INSERT_FIELD(status, MSTATUS_MPP, PRV_U);
/* Enable IRQs for user mode */
status = INSERT_FIELD(status, MSTATUS_MPIE, 1);
/* Disable IRQs for m-mode until the mode switch */
status = INSERT_FIELD(status, MSTATUS_MIE, 0);
csr_write(mstatus, status);
csr_write(mepc, z_thread_entry);
#ifdef CONFIG_PMP_STACK_GUARD
/* reconfigure as the kernel mode stack will be different */
z_riscv_pmp_stackguard_prepare(_current);
#endif
/* Set up Physical Memory Protection */
z_riscv_pmp_usermode_prepare(_current);
z_riscv_pmp_usermode_enable(_current);
/* preserve stack pointer for next exception entry */
arch_curr_cpu()->arch.user_exc_sp = top_of_priv_stack;
is_user_mode = true;
register void *a0 __asm__("a0") = user_entry;
register void *a1 __asm__("a1") = p1;
register void *a2 __asm__("a2") = p2;
register void *a3 __asm__("a3") = p3;
__asm__ volatile (
"mv sp, %4; mret"
:
: "r" (a0), "r" (a1), "r" (a2), "r" (a3), "r" (top_of_user_stack)
: "memory");
CODE_UNREACHABLE;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_USERSPACE */