zephyr/arch/riscv/core/isr.S

538 lines
14 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/*
* Copyright (c) 2016 Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
* Copyright (c) 2018 Foundries.io Ltd
* Copyright (c) 2020 BayLibre, SAS
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
*/
#include <toolchain.h>
#include <linker/sections.h>
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
#include <offsets_short.h>
headers: Refactor kernel and arch headers. This commit refactors kernel and arch headers to establish a boundary between private and public interface headers. The refactoring strategy used in this commit is detailed in the issue This commit introduces the following major changes: 1. Establish a clear boundary between private and public headers by removing "kernel/include" and "arch/*/include" from the global include paths. Ideally, only kernel/ and arch/*/ source files should reference the headers in these directories. If these headers must be used by a component, these include paths shall be manually added to the CMakeLists.txt file of the component. This is intended to discourage applications from including private kernel and arch headers either knowingly and unknowingly. - kernel/include/ (PRIVATE) This directory contains the private headers that provide private kernel definitions which should not be visible outside the kernel and arch source code. All public kernel definitions must be added to an appropriate header located under include/. - arch/*/include/ (PRIVATE) This directory contains the private headers that provide private architecture-specific definitions which should not be visible outside the arch and kernel source code. All public architecture- specific definitions must be added to an appropriate header located under include/arch/*/. - include/ AND include/sys/ (PUBLIC) This directory contains the public headers that provide public kernel definitions which can be referenced by both kernel and application code. - include/arch/*/ (PUBLIC) This directory contains the public headers that provide public architecture-specific definitions which can be referenced by both kernel and application code. 2. Split arch_interface.h into "kernel-to-arch interface" and "public arch interface" divisions. - kernel/include/kernel_arch_interface.h * provides private "kernel-to-arch interface" definition. * includes arch/*/include/kernel_arch_func.h to ensure that the interface function implementations are always available. * includes sys/arch_interface.h so that public arch interface definitions are automatically included when including this file. - arch/*/include/kernel_arch_func.h * provides architecture-specific "kernel-to-arch interface" implementation. * only the functions that will be used in kernel and arch source files are defined here. - include/sys/arch_interface.h * provides "public arch interface" definition. * includes include/arch/arch_inlines.h to ensure that the architecture-specific public inline interface function implementations are always available. - include/arch/arch_inlines.h * includes architecture-specific arch_inlines.h in include/arch/*/arch_inline.h. - include/arch/*/arch_inline.h * provides architecture-specific "public arch interface" inline function implementation. * supersedes include/sys/arch_inline.h. 3. Refactor kernel and the existing architecture implementations. - Remove circular dependency of kernel and arch headers. The following general rules should be observed: * Never include any private headers from public headers * Never include kernel_internal.h in kernel_arch_data.h * Always include kernel_arch_data.h from kernel_arch_func.h * Never include kernel.h from kernel_struct.h either directly or indirectly. Only add the kernel structures that must be referenced from public arch headers in this file. - Relocate syscall_handler.h to include/ so it can be used in the public code. This is necessary because many user-mode public codes reference the functions defined in this header. - Relocate kernel_arch_thread.h to include/arch/*/thread.h. This is necessary to provide architecture-specific thread definition for 'struct k_thread' in kernel.h. - Remove any private header dependencies from public headers using the following methods: * If dependency is not required, simply omit * If dependency is required, - Relocate a portion of the required dependencies from the private header to an appropriate public header OR - Relocate the required private header to make it public. This commit supersedes #20047, addresses #19666, and fixes #3056. Signed-off-by: Stephanos Ioannidis <root@stephanos.io>
2019-10-25 00:08:21 +09:00
#include <arch/cpu.h>
#include <sys/util.h>
#include <kernel.h>
#include <syscall.h>
#include <arch/riscv/csr.h>
#include <arch/riscv/syscall.h>
#include "asm_macros.inc"
/* Convenience macros for loading/storing register states. */
#define DO_FP_CALLER_SAVED(op, reg) \
op ft0, __z_arch_esf_t_ft0_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op ft1, __z_arch_esf_t_ft1_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op ft2, __z_arch_esf_t_ft2_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op ft3, __z_arch_esf_t_ft3_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op ft4, __z_arch_esf_t_ft4_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op ft5, __z_arch_esf_t_ft5_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op ft6, __z_arch_esf_t_ft6_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op ft7, __z_arch_esf_t_ft7_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op ft8, __z_arch_esf_t_ft8_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op ft9, __z_arch_esf_t_ft9_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op ft10, __z_arch_esf_t_ft10_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op ft11, __z_arch_esf_t_ft11_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op fa0, __z_arch_esf_t_fa0_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op fa1, __z_arch_esf_t_fa1_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op fa2, __z_arch_esf_t_fa2_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op fa3, __z_arch_esf_t_fa3_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op fa4, __z_arch_esf_t_fa4_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op fa5, __z_arch_esf_t_fa5_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op fa6, __z_arch_esf_t_fa6_OFFSET(reg) ;\
op fa7, __z_arch_esf_t_fa7_OFFSET(reg) ;
#define DO_CALLER_SAVED(op) \
op ra, __z_arch_esf_t_ra_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op t0, __z_arch_esf_t_t0_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op t1, __z_arch_esf_t_t1_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op t2, __z_arch_esf_t_t2_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op t3, __z_arch_esf_t_t3_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op t4, __z_arch_esf_t_t4_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op t5, __z_arch_esf_t_t5_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op t6, __z_arch_esf_t_t6_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op a0, __z_arch_esf_t_a0_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op a1, __z_arch_esf_t_a1_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op a2, __z_arch_esf_t_a2_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op a3, __z_arch_esf_t_a3_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op a4, __z_arch_esf_t_a4_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op a5, __z_arch_esf_t_a5_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op a6, __z_arch_esf_t_a6_OFFSET(sp) ;\
op a7, __z_arch_esf_t_a7_OFFSET(sp) ;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#define GET_CURRENT_CPU(dst, tmp) \
csrr tmp, mhartid ;\
la dst, _kernel + ___kernel_t_cpus_OFFSET ;\
shiftmul_add dst, tmp, ___cpu_t_SIZEOF
#else
#define GET_CURRENT_CPU(dst, tmp) \
la dst, _kernel + ___kernel_t_cpus_OFFSET
#endif
#define ASSUME_EQUAL(x, y) .if x != y; .err; .endif
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/* imports */
GDATA(_sw_isr_table)
GTEXT(__soc_is_irq)
GTEXT(__soc_handle_irq)
GTEXT(_Fault)
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE
GTEXT(__soc_save_context)
GTEXT(__soc_restore_context)
#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE */
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
GTEXT(z_riscv_fatal_error)
GTEXT(z_get_next_switch_handle)
GTEXT(z_riscv_switch)
GTEXT(z_riscv_thread_start)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
GTEXT(sys_trace_isr_enter)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_USERSPACE
GDATA(_k_syscall_table)
#endif
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/* exports */
GTEXT(__irq_wrapper)
/* use ABI name of registers for the sake of simplicity */
/*
* Generic architecture-level IRQ handling, along with callouts to
* SoC-specific routines.
*
* Architecture level IRQ handling includes basic context save/restore
* of standard registers and calling ISRs registered at Zephyr's driver
* level.
*
* Since RISC-V does not completely prescribe IRQ handling behavior,
* implementations vary (some implementations also deviate from
* what standard behavior is defined). Hence, the arch level code expects
* the following functions to be provided at the SOC level:
*
* - __soc_is_irq: decide if we're handling an interrupt or an exception
* - __soc_handle_irq: handle SoC-specific details for a pending IRQ
* (e.g. clear a pending bit in a SoC-specific register)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
*
* If CONFIG_RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE=y, calls to SoC-level context save/restore
* routines are also made here. For details, see the Kconfig help text.
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
*/
/*
* Handler called upon each exception/interrupt/fault
* In this architecture, system call (ECALL) is used to perform context
* switching or IRQ offloading (when enabled).
*/
SECTION_FUNC(exception.entry, __irq_wrapper)
#ifdef CONFIG_USERSPACE
/*
* The scratch register contains either the privileged stack pointer
* to use when interrupting a user mode thread, or 0 when interrupting
* kernel mode in which case the current stack should be used.
*/
csrrw sp, mscratch, sp
bnez sp, 1f
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/* restore privileged stack pointer and zero the scratch reg */
csrrw sp, mscratch, sp
1:
#endif
/* Save caller-saved registers on current thread stack. */
addi sp, sp, -__z_arch_esf_t_SIZEOF
DO_CALLER_SAVED(sr) ;
/* Save s0 in the esf and load it with &_current_cpu. */
sr s0, __z_arch_esf_t_s0_OFFSET(sp)
GET_CURRENT_CPU(s0, t0)
#ifdef CONFIG_USERSPACE
/*
* The scratch register now contains either the user mode stack
* pointer, or 0 if entered from kernel mode. Retrieve that value
* and zero the scratch register as we are in kernel mode now.
*/
csrrw t0, mscratch, zero
bnez t0, 1f
/* came from kernel mode: adjust stack value */
add t0, sp, __z_arch_esf_t_SIZEOF
1:
/* save stack value to be restored later */
sr t0, __z_arch_esf_t_sp_OFFSET(sp)
/* Clear user mode variable */
la t0, is_user_mode
sw zero, 0(t0)
#endif
/* Save MEPC register */
csrr t0, mepc
sr t0, __z_arch_esf_t_mepc_OFFSET(sp)
/* Save MSTATUS register */
csrr t4, mstatus
sr t4, __z_arch_esf_t_mstatus_OFFSET(sp)
#if defined(CONFIG_FPU) && defined(CONFIG_FPU_SHARING)
/* Assess whether floating-point registers need to be saved. */
li t1, MSTATUS_FS_INIT
and t0, t4, t1
beqz t0, skip_store_fp_caller_saved
DO_FP_CALLER_SAVED(fsr, sp)
skip_store_fp_caller_saved:
#endif /* CONFIG_FPU && CONFIG_FPU_SHARING */
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE
/* Handle context saving at SOC level. */
addi a0, sp, __z_arch_esf_t_soc_context_OFFSET
jal ra, __soc_save_context
#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE */
/*
* Check if exception is the result of an interrupt or not.
* (SOC dependent). Following the RISC-V architecture spec, the MSB
* of the mcause register is used to indicate whether an exception
* is the result of an interrupt or an exception/fault. But for some
* SOCs (like pulpino or riscv-qemu), the MSB is never set to indicate
* interrupt. Hence, check for interrupt/exception via the __soc_is_irq
* function (that needs to be implemented by each SOC). The result is
* returned via register a0 (1: interrupt, 0 exception)
*/
jal ra, __soc_is_irq
/* If a0 != 0, jump to is_interrupt */
bnez a0, is_interrupt
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
#ifdef CONFIG_PMP_STACK_GUARD
li t0, MSTATUS_MPRV
csrs mstatus, t0
#endif
/*
* If the exception is the result of an ECALL, check whether to
* perform a context-switch or an IRQ offload. Otherwise call _Fault
* to report the exception.
*/
csrr t0, mcause
li t2, SOC_MCAUSE_EXP_MASK
and t0, t0, t2
/*
* If mcause == SOC_MCAUSE_ECALL_EXP, handle system call from
* kernel thread.
*/
li t1, SOC_MCAUSE_ECALL_EXP
beq t0, t1, is_kernel_syscall
#ifdef CONFIG_USERSPACE
/*
* If mcause == SOC_MCAUSE_USER_ECALL_EXP, handle system call
* for user mode thread.
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
*/
li t1, SOC_MCAUSE_USER_ECALL_EXP
beq t0, t1, is_user_syscall
#endif /* CONFIG_USERSPACE */
/*
* Call _Fault to handle exception.
* Stack pointer is pointing to a z_arch_esf_t structure, pass it
* to _Fault (via register a0).
* If _Fault shall return, set return address to
* no_reschedule to restore stack.
*/
mv a0, sp
la ra, no_reschedule
tail _Fault
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
is_kernel_syscall:
/*
* A syscall is the result of an ecall instruction, in which case the
* MEPC will contain the address of the ecall instruction.
* Increment saved MEPC by 4 to prevent triggering the same ecall
* again upon exiting the ISR.
*
* It's safe to always increment by 4, even with compressed
* instructions, because the ecall instruction is always 4 bytes.
*/
lr t0, __z_arch_esf_t_mepc_OFFSET(sp)
addi t0, t0, 4
sr t0, __z_arch_esf_t_mepc_OFFSET(sp)
/* Determine what to do. Operation code is in a7. */
lr a7, __z_arch_esf_t_a7_OFFSET(sp)
ASSUME_EQUAL(RV_ECALL_RUNTIME_EXCEPT, 0)
beqz a7, do_fault
#if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_OFFLOAD)
addi a7, a7, -1
ASSUME_EQUAL(RV_ECALL_IRQ_OFFLOAD, 1)
beqz a7, do_irq_offload
#endif
/* default fault code is K_ERR_KERNEL_OOPS */
li a0, 3
j 1f
do_fault:
/* Handle RV_ECALL_RUNTIME_EXCEPT. Retrieve reason in a0, esf in A1. */
lr a0, __z_arch_esf_t_a0_OFFSET(sp)
1: mv a1, sp
tail z_riscv_fatal_error
#if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_OFFLOAD)
do_irq_offload:
/*
* Retrieve provided routine and argument from the stack.
* Routine pointer is in saved a0, argument in saved a1
* so we load them with a1/a0 (reversed).
*/
lr a1, __z_arch_esf_t_a0_OFFSET(sp)
lr a0, __z_arch_esf_t_a1_OFFSET(sp)
/* Increment _current_cpu->nested */
lw t3, ___cpu_t_nested_OFFSET(s0)
addi t4, t3, 1
sw t4, ___cpu_t_nested_OFFSET(s0)
bnez t3, 1f
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/* Switch to interrupt stack */
mv t0, sp
lr sp, ___cpu_t_irq_stack_OFFSET(s0)
/* Save thread stack pointer on interrupt stack */
addi sp, sp, -16
sr t0, 0(sp)
1:
/* Execute provided routine (argument is in a0 already). */
jalr ra, a1, 0
/* Leave through the regular IRQ exit path */
j irq_done
#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_OFFLOAD */
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
#ifdef CONFIG_USERSPACE
is_user_syscall:
/* It is safe to re-enable IRQs now */
csrs mstatus, MSTATUS_IEN
/*
* Same as for is_kernel_syscall: increment saved MEPC by 4 to
* prevent triggering the same ecall again upon exiting the ISR.
*/
lr t1, __z_arch_esf_t_mepc_OFFSET(sp)
addi t1, t1, 4
sr t1, __z_arch_esf_t_mepc_OFFSET(sp)
/* Restore argument registers from user stack */
lr a0, __z_arch_esf_t_a0_OFFSET(sp)
lr a1, __z_arch_esf_t_a1_OFFSET(sp)
lr a2, __z_arch_esf_t_a2_OFFSET(sp)
lr a3, __z_arch_esf_t_a3_OFFSET(sp)
lr a4, __z_arch_esf_t_a4_OFFSET(sp)
lr a5, __z_arch_esf_t_a5_OFFSET(sp)
mv a6, sp
lr a7, __z_arch_esf_t_a7_OFFSET(sp)
/* validate syscall limit */
li t0, K_SYSCALL_LIMIT
bltu a7, t0, valid_syscall_id
/* bad syscall id. Set arg1 to bad id and set call_id to SYSCALL_BAD */
mv a0, a7
li a7, K_SYSCALL_BAD
valid_syscall_id:
la t0, _k_syscall_table
slli t1, a7, RV_REGSHIFT # Determine offset from indice value
add t0, t0, t1 # Table addr + offset = function addr
lr t3, 0(t0) # Load function address
/* Execute syscall function */
jalr ra, t3, 0
/* Update a0 (return value) on the stack */
sr a0, __z_arch_esf_t_a0_OFFSET(sp)
/* Disable IRQs again before leaving */
csrc mstatus, MSTATUS_IEN
j might_have_rescheduled
#endif /* CONFIG_USERSPACE */
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
is_interrupt:
/* Increment _current_cpu->nested */
lw t3, ___cpu_t_nested_OFFSET(s0)
addi t4, t3, 1
sw t4, ___cpu_t_nested_OFFSET(s0)
bnez t3, on_irq_stack
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/* Switch to interrupt stack */
mv t0, sp
lr sp, ___cpu_t_irq_stack_OFFSET(s0)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/*
* Save thread stack pointer on interrupt stack
* In RISC-V, stack pointer needs to be 16-byte aligned
*/
addi sp, sp, -16
sr t0, 0(sp)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
on_irq_stack:
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING_ISR
call sys_trace_isr_enter
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
#endif
/* Get IRQ causing interrupt */
csrr a0, mcause
li t0, SOC_MCAUSE_EXP_MASK
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
and a0, a0, t0
/*
* Clear pending IRQ generating the interrupt at SOC level
* Pass IRQ number to __soc_handle_irq via register a0
*/
jal ra, __soc_handle_irq
/*
* Call corresponding registered function in _sw_isr_table.
* (table is 2-word wide, we should shift index accordingly)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
*/
la t0, _sw_isr_table
slli a0, a0, (RV_REGSHIFT + 1)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
add t0, t0, a0
/* Load argument in a0 register */
lr a0, 0(t0)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/* Load ISR function address in register t1 */
lr t1, RV_REGSIZE(t0)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/* Call ISR function */
jalr ra, t1, 0
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
irq_done:
/* Decrement _current_cpu->nested */
lw t2, ___cpu_t_nested_OFFSET(s0)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
addi t2, t2, -1
sw t2, ___cpu_t_nested_OFFSET(s0)
bnez t2, no_reschedule
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/* nested count is back to 0: Return to thread stack */
lr sp, 0(sp)
#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_SENTINEL
call z_check_stack_sentinel
#endif
reschedule:
/* Get pointer to current thread on this CPU */
lr a1, ___cpu_t_current_OFFSET(s0)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/*
* Get next thread to schedule with z_get_next_switch_handle().
* We pass it a NULL as we didn't save the whole thread context yet.
* If no scheduling is necessary then NULL will be returned.
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
*/
addi sp, sp, -16
sr a1, 0(sp)
mv a0, zero
call z_get_next_switch_handle
lr a1, 0(sp)
addi sp, sp, 16
beqz a0, no_reschedule
/*
* Perform context switch:
* a0 = new thread
* a1 = old thread
*/
call z_riscv_switch
z_riscv_thread_start:
might_have_rescheduled:
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* reload s0 with &_current_cpu as it might have changed */
GET_CURRENT_CPU(s0, t0)
#endif
no_reschedule:
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE
/* Restore context at SOC level */
addi a0, sp, __z_arch_esf_t_soc_context_OFFSET
jal ra, __soc_restore_context
#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE */
/* Restore MEPC register */
lr t0, __z_arch_esf_t_mepc_OFFSET(sp)
csrw mepc, t0
/* Restore MSTATUS register */
lr t4, __z_arch_esf_t_mstatus_OFFSET(sp)
csrrw t5, mstatus, t4
#if defined(CONFIG_FPU) && defined(CONFIG_FPU_SHARING)
/*
* Determine if we need to restore FP regs based on the previous
* (before the csr above) mstatus value available in t5.
*/
li t1, MSTATUS_FS_INIT
and t0, t5, t1
beqz t0, no_fp
/* make sure FP is enabled in the restored mstatus */
csrs mstatus, t1
DO_FP_CALLER_SAVED(flr, sp)
j 1f
no_fp: /* make sure this is reflected in the restored mstatus */
csrc mstatus, t1
1:
#endif /* CONFIG_FPU && CONFIG_FPU_SHARING */
#ifdef CONFIG_USERSPACE
/*
* Check if we are returning to user mode. If so then we must
* set is_user_mode to true and load the scratch register with
* the stack pointer to be used with the next exception to come.
*/
li t1, MSTATUS_MPP
and t0, t4, t1
bnez t0, 1f
/* Set user mode variable */
li t0, 1
la t1, is_user_mode
sw t0, 0(t1)
/* load scratch reg with stack pointer for next exception entry */
add t0, sp, __z_arch_esf_t_SIZEOF
csrw mscratch, t0
1:
#endif
/* Restore s0 (it is no longer ours) */
lr s0, __z_arch_esf_t_s0_OFFSET(sp)
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/* Restore caller-saved registers from thread stack */
DO_CALLER_SAVED(lr)
#ifdef CONFIG_USERSPACE
/* retrieve saved stack pointer */
lr sp, __z_arch_esf_t_sp_OFFSET(sp)
#else
/* remove esf from the stack */
addi sp, sp, __z_arch_esf_t_SIZEOF
#endif
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 00:24:30 +01:00
/* Call SOC_ERET to exit ISR */
SOC_ERET