6e8775ff84
Several reviewers agreed that DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(...) was an undesirable API for the following reasons: - it's inconsistent with the rest of the DT_NODE_HAS_FOO names - DT_NODE_HAS_FOO_BAR_BAZ(node) was agreed upon as a shorthand for macros which are equivalent to DT_NODE_HAS_FOO(node) && DT_NODE_HAS_BAR(node) && - DT_NODE_HAS_BAZ(node), and DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY is an odd duck - DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(..., okay) was viewed as more readable anyway - it is seen as a somewhat aesthetically challenged name Replace all users with DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(..., okay), which is semantically equivalent. This is mostly done with sed, but a few remaining cases were done by hand, along with whitespace, docs, and comment changes. These special cases include the Nordic SOC static assert files. Signed-off-by: Martí Bolívar <marti.bolivar@nordicsemi.no>
33 lines
730 B
C
33 lines
730 B
C
/*
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2017 BayLibre, SAS
|
|
*
|
|
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <kernel.h>
|
|
#include <device.h>
|
|
#include <init.h>
|
|
#include <drivers/pinmux.h>
|
|
#include <sys/sys_io.h>
|
|
|
|
#include "pinmux/stm32/pinmux_stm32.h"
|
|
|
|
/* pin assignments for STM32F072-EVAL board */
|
|
static const struct pin_config pinconf[] = {
|
|
#if DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(DT_NODELABEL(usart2), okay)
|
|
{STM32_PIN_PD5, STM32F0_PINMUX_FUNC_PD5_USART2_TX},
|
|
{STM32_PIN_PD6, STM32F0_PINMUX_FUNC_PD6_USART2_RX},
|
|
#endif
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static int pinmux_stm32_init(struct device *port)
|
|
{
|
|
ARG_UNUSED(port);
|
|
|
|
stm32_setup_pins(pinconf, ARRAY_SIZE(pinconf));
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
SYS_INIT(pinmux_stm32_init, PRE_KERNEL_1,
|
|
CONFIG_PINMUX_STM32_DEVICE_INITIALIZATION_PRIORITY);
|