Several reviewers agreed that DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(...) was an
undesirable API for the following reasons:
- it's inconsistent with the rest of the DT_NODE_HAS_FOO names
- DT_NODE_HAS_FOO_BAR_BAZ(node) was agreed upon as a shorthand
for macros which are equivalent to
DT_NODE_HAS_FOO(node) && DT_NODE_HAS_BAR(node) &&
- DT_NODE_HAS_BAZ(node), and DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY is an odd duck
- DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(..., okay) was viewed as more readable anyway
- it is seen as a somewhat aesthetically challenged name
Replace all users with DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(..., okay), which is
semantically equivalent.
This is mostly done with sed, but a few remaining cases were done by
hand, along with whitespace, docs, and comment changes. These special
cases include the Nordic SOC static assert files.
Signed-off-by: Martí Bolívar <marti.bolivar@nordicsemi.no>
Rename DT_HAS_NODE to DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY so the semantics are
clear. As going forward DT_HAS_NODE will report if a NODE exists
regardless of its status.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org>
As prep for drivers being converted to utilize DT_INST and removal of
per instance Kconfig symbols, move soc.c code to utilize DT_NODELABEL
instead.
Also rename various node labels to match the SoC docs.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org>
Promote the private z_arch_* namespace, which specifies
the interface between the core kernel and the
architecture code, to a new top-level namespace named
arch_*.
This allows our documentation generation to create
online documentation for this set of interfaces,
and this set of interfaces is worth treating in a
more formal way anyway.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
With the upcoming riscv64 support, it is best to use "riscv" as the
subdirectory name and common symbols as riscv32 and riscv64 support
code is almost identical. Then later decide whether 32-bit or 64-bit
compilation is wanted.
Redirects for the web documentation are also included.
Then zephyrbot complained about this:
"
New files added that are not covered in CODEOWNERS:
dts/riscv/microsemi-miv.dtsi
dts/riscv/riscv32-fe310.dtsi
Please add one or more entries in the CODEOWNERS file to cover
those files
"
So I assigned them to those who created them. Feel free to readjust
as necessary.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <npitre@baylibre.com>
2019-08-02 13:54:48 -07:00
Renamed from soc/riscv32/openisa_rv32m1/soc.c (Browse further)
