This is part of the core kernel -> architecture interface and
has been renamed z_arch_kernel_init().
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
z_set_thread_return_value is part of the core kernel -> arch
interface and has been renamed to z_arch_thread_return_value_set.
z_set_thread_return_value_with_data renamed to
z_thread_return_value_set_with_data for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
k_cpu_idle() and k_cpu_atomic_idle() were being directly
implemented by arch code.
Rename these implementations to z_arch_cpu_idle() and
z_arch_cpu_atomic_idle(), and call them from new inline
function definitions in kernel.h.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
This is part of the core kernel -> architecture interface
and is appropriately renamed z_arch_is_in_isr().
References from test cases changed to k_is_in_isr().
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
Consistently place C++ use of extern "C" after all include directives,
within the negative branch of _ASMLANGUAGE if used.
Remove extern "C" support from files that don't declare objects or
functions.
Background from issue #17997:
Declarations that use C linkage should be placed within extern "C"
so the language linkage is correct when the header is included by
a C++ compiler.
Similarly #include directives should be outside the extern "C" to
ensure the language-specific default linkage is applied to any
declarations provided by the included header.
See: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/language_linkage
Signed-off-by: Peter Bigot <peter.bigot@nordicsemi.no>
There are two aspects to this: CPU registers are twice as big, and the
load and store instructions must use the 'd' suffix instead of the 'w'
one. To abstract register differences, we simply use a ulong_t instead
of u32_t given that RISC-V is either ILP32 or LP64. And the relevant
lw/sw instructions are replaced by LR/SR (load/store register) that get
defined as either lw/sw or ld/sd. Finally a few constants to deal with
register offsets are also provided.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <npitre@baylibre.com>
With the upcoming riscv64 support, it is best to use "riscv" as the
subdirectory name and common symbols as riscv32 and riscv64 support
code is almost identical. Then later decide whether 32-bit or 64-bit
compilation is wanted.
Redirects for the web documentation are also included.
Then zephyrbot complained about this:
"
New files added that are not covered in CODEOWNERS:
dts/riscv/microsemi-miv.dtsi
dts/riscv/riscv32-fe310.dtsi
Please add one or more entries in the CODEOWNERS file to cover
those files
"
So I assigned them to those who created them. Feel free to readjust
as necessary.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <npitre@baylibre.com>
