... because it is (required).
This makes a difference when building with CMake and forgetting
ZEPHYR_BASE or not registering Zephyr in the CMake package registry.
In this particular case, REQUIRED turns this harmless looking log
statement:
-- Could NOT find Zephyr (missing: Zephyr_DIR)
-- The C compiler identification is GNU 9.3.0
-- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 9.3.0
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc
-- ...
-- ...
-- ...
-- Detecting CXX compile features
-- Detecting CXX compile features - done
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:8 (target_sources):
Cannot specify sources for target "app" which is not built by
this project.
... into this louder, clearer, faster and (last but not least) final
error:
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:5 (find_package):
Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Zephyr" with
any of the following names:
ZephyrConfig.cmake
zephyr-config.cmake
Add the installation prefix of "Zephyr" to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set
"Zephyr_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above files. If
"Zephyr" provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it
has been installed.
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>
Do not attempt to build on all boards. Instead, do a build-only pass
of the generic test case on all boards with EEPROM support.
Signed-off-by: Henrik Brix Andersen <hebad@vestas.com>
Using find_package to locate Zephyr.
Old behavior was to use $ENV{ZEPHYR_BASE} for inclusion of boiler plate
code.
Whenever an automatic run of CMake happend by the build system / IDE
then it was required that ZEPHYR_BASE was defined.
Using ZEPHYR_BASE only to locate the Zephyr package allows CMake to
cache the base variable and thus allowing subsequent invocation even
if ZEPHYR_BASE is not set in the environment.
It also removes the risk of strange build results if a user switchs
between different Zephyr based project folders and forgetting to reset
ZEPHYR_BASE before running ninja / make.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Rasmussen <Torsten.Rasmussen@nordicsemi.no>
Add support for a eeprom simulator. The PR limits the addition to
qemu_x86 but it can easily be added to other devices by defining the
eeprom simulator in the dts and setting 'CONFIG_EEPROM_SIMULATOR=y'
Signed-off-by: Laczen JMS <laczenjms@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
The seasonal overhaul of test identifiers aligning the terms being used
and creating a structure. This is hopefully the last time we do this,
plan is to document the identifiers and enforce syntax.
The end-goal is to be able to generate a testsuite description from the
existing tests and sync it frequently with the testsuite in Testrail.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
Add EEPROM API test suite.
The test suite is written to run in userspace but it is currently only
whitelisted for native_posix and native_posix_64 boards which do not
support userspace.
Signed-off-by: Henrik Brix Andersen <hebad@vestas.com>
