Check that a power state that has system-managed device power
management disabled does not trigger device power management
when the system sleeps.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
testing_device_lock is no longer used and the logic
using it is never used / needed. Just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
This API is not widely used and it is actually broken since device
runtime power management is not checking it when suspending and
resuming.
On top of that, this API is very close to pm_device_busy* API,
close enough to consolidate in only one API.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
Enable all these tests which run in native_posix in native_sim,
Switch from native_posix to native_sim as default test platform
And switch native_posix overlays to native_sim.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Escolar Piedras <alberto.escolar.piedras@nordicsemi.no>
Some tests provide their own PM hooks, adapted for testing purposes. Add
a new option to select HAS_PM, so that CONFIG_PM can be enabled.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard@teslabs.com>
Remove all init functions that do nothing, and provide a `NULL` to
*DEVICE*DEFINE* macros.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
The PM subsystem should not call the PM control callbacks on
uninitialized devices when entering low-power states.
Signed-off-by: Corey Wharton <xodus7@cwharton.com>
For tests that set CONFIG_MP_NUM_CPUS, switch to using
CONFIG_MP_MAX_NUM_CPUS instead as we work to phase out
CONFIG_MP_NUM_CPUS.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@intel.com>
As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Add a bunch of missing "zephyr/" prefixes to #include statements in
various test and test framework files.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
Sometimes we want to entirely decouple the system PM from the device PM,
leaving the devices to manage its own power states using the runtime PM.
This is currently not possible because the suspend / resume code path is
triggering the device PM hooks even when the runtime PM is enabled.
Introduce a new PM_DEVICE_RUNTIME_EXCLUSIVE symbol to allow the platform
to skip the device PM triggers on suspend / resume.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <ccaione@baylibre.com>
Files including <zephyr/kernel.h> do not have to include
<zephyr/zephyr.h>, a shim to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
In order to bring consistency in-tree, migrate all tests to the new
prefix <zephyr/...>. Note that the conversion has been scripted, refer
to #45388 for more details.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Validate the behaviour of `k_can_yield` in pre-kernel, ISR, and idle
thread and standard thread contexts.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Yates <jordan.yates@data61.csiro.au>
The residency policy, is in reality, influences by other parameters for
example constraints. It has been renamed to "DEFAULT" policy to make it
more general. The "APP" policy has been renamed to "CUSTOM" to better
represent its purpose.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Aligning with the rest of PM API, replace pm_power_state_exit_post_ops
with pm_state_exit_post_ops.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
In order to align with macros used to obtain a device reference (e.g.
DEVICE_DT_GET), align the PM macros to use "GET" instead of "REF". This
change should have low impact since no official release has gone out yet
with the "REF" macros.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Return a constant reference to the next state instead of a copy of
struct pm_state_info. When the next state should be active, just return
NULL. Struct copying should be in general avoided, specially in code
paths executed frequently as is this one.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Change the function pm_device_runtime_enable() to return 0 on
success or an error code in case of error.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
Add a test case for the device PM busy API (previously part of kernel
device tests).
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
The device PM subsystem _depends_ on device, not vice-versa. Devices
only hold a reference to struct pm_device now, and initialize this
reference with the value provided in Z_DEVICE_DEFINE. This requirement
can be solved with a forward struct declaration, meaning there is no
need to include device PM headers.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Since drivers implement a callback based on action and not the state,
we should be using the API based on the action instead of the one based
on the state.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
Using a more descriptive name for a global variable since "dev" is
widely used in several APIs signature.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
This test implements power management entirely in the application, it is
not using anything from the platform so it can be tested using only
native_posix. Also, there already exists power_mgmt_soc to test power
management on real HW.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
Check if the system power management does not interfere with a device
when it has enabled device runtime PM.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
The PM callback is no longer referenced as "pm_control" but
"pm_action_cb", so reflect this new naming on the callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
