All in tree device drivers use some form of DEVICE_DT_GET
so we no longer need to require label properties.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.org>
Add any useful information from 'title:' to the 'description:' strings
(e.g. explanations of acronyms), and remove 'title:' as well as any
copy-pasted "this binding gives a ..." boilerplate.
Also clean some description strings up a bit.
Some other things could probably be cleaned up (replacing 'GPIO node'
with 'GPIO controller' on controllers for consistency, for example), but
I kept things close to the original to avoid accidentally messing up.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <Ulf.Magnusson@nordicsemi.no>
With https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/20185, multi-line
descriptions will be formatted nicely, but using '>' breaks it, because
it removes internal newlines (including between paragraphs).
See https://yaml-multiline.info/.
Replace 'description: >' with 'description: |' to encourage '|'. That'll
prevent '>' from getting copied around and messing up long descriptions.
This will lead to some extra newlines in the output, but it's fine.
Line-wrapping messes up any manual formatting.
The replacement was done with
$ git ls-files 'dts/bindings/*.yaml' | \
xargs sed -i 's/description:\s*>/description: |/'
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <Ulf.Magnusson@nordicsemi.no>
Implement a nice generalization suggested by Bobby Noelte.
Instead of having a generic #cells key in bindings, have source-specific
*-cells keys. Some examples:
interrupt-cells:
- irq
- priority
- flags
gpio-cells:
- pin
- flags
pwm-cells:
- channel
- period
This makes bindings a bit easier to read, and allows a node to be a
controller for many different 'phandle-array' properties.
The prefix before *-cells is derived from the property name, meaning
there's no fixed set of *-cells keys. This is possible because of the
earlier 'phandle-array' generalization.
The older #cells key is supported for backwards compatibility, but
generates a deprecation warning.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <Ulf.Magnusson@nordicsemi.no>
Each intmux block acts like 8 interrupt controllers in which we can
have multiple device interrupts on a single channel and that channel
than interrupt than chained to another interrupt controller (in the
case of the RISC-V cores, it is the event unit).
So to describe things better to properly be able to walk the interrupt
chain in the device tree we treat each channel in the interrupt mux as
an interrupt controller rather than the intmux as a single interrupt
controller.
In the future this will allow the device tree generation code to walk
the interrupt chain from the device and up through any interrupt
controllers to generate the IRQ value that Zephyr expects (rather than
us hard coding this into the DTS).
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org>
