michaelh/zephyr
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

tests/kernel: fifo_timeout: Remove wake-up order checking

Browse source 
There is no guarantee of wake-up order when multiple threads
are woken up on the same tick. Hence, modified the tests
accordingly.

Fixes #8159.

Signed-off-by: Rajavardhan Gundi <rajavardhan.gundi@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Rajavardhan Gundi 2018-09-18 11:27:49 +05:30 • committed by Anas Nashif
commit fa77e400aa
1 changed files with 35 additions and 4 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

39
tests/kernel/fifo/fifo_timeout/src/main.c
View file

@ -135,7 +135,8 @@ static void test_thread_pend_and_timeout(void *p1, void *p2, void *p3)
static int test_multiple_threads_pending(struct timeout_order_data *test_data,
int test_data_size)
{
int ii;
int ii, j;
u32_t diff_ms;
for (ii = 0; ii < test_data_size; ii++) {
tid[ii] = k_thread_create(&ttdata[ii], ttstack[ii], TSTACK_SIZE,
@ -144,6 +145,14 @@ static int test_multiple_threads_pending(struct timeout_order_data *test_data,
FIFO_THREAD_PRIO, K_INHERIT_PERMS, 0);
}
/* In general, there is no guarantee of wakeup order when multiple
* threads are woken up on the same tick. This can especially happen
* when the system is loaded. However, in this particular test, we
* are controlling the system state and hence we can make a reasonable
* estimation of a timeout occurring with the max deviation of an
* additional tick. Hence the timeout order may slightly be different
* from what we normally expect.
*/
for (ii = 0; ii < test_data_size; ii++) {
struct timeout_order_data *data =
k_fifo_get(&timeout_order_fifo, K_FOREVER);
@ -152,9 +161,31 @@ static int test_multiple_threads_pending(struct timeout_order_data *test_data,
TC_PRINT(" thread (q order: %d, t/o: %d, fifo %p)\n",
data->q_order, data->timeout, data->fifo);
} else {
TC_ERROR(" *** thread %d woke up, expected %d\n",
data->timeout_order, ii);
return TC_FAIL;
/* Get the index of the thread which should have
* actually timed out.
*/
for (j = 0; j < test_data_size; j++) {
if (test_data[j].timeout_order == ii) {
break;
}
}
if (data->timeout > test_data[j].timeout) {
diff_ms = data->timeout - test_data[j].timeout;
} else {
diff_ms = test_data[j].timeout - data->timeout;
}
if (_ms_to_ticks(diff_ms) == 1) {
TC_PRINT(
" thread (q order: %d, t/o: %d, fifo %p)\n",
data->q_order, data->timeout, data->fifo);
} else {
TC_ERROR(
" *** thread %d woke up, expected %d\n",
data->timeout_order, ii);
return TC_FAIL;
}
}
}