soc: nordic: add support for SPIS120 instance
It is defined as spis120 rather than spi120, because spi120 is already used for SPIM120 hardware instance, but their base address is different. Signed-off-by: Nikodem Kastelik <nikodem.kastelik@nordicsemi.no>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c0362a98ae
commit
d8506af12a
4 changed files with 19 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ config HAS_HW_NRF_SPIS30
|
|||
def_bool $(dt_nodelabel_enabled_with_compat,spi30,$(DT_COMPAT_NORDIC_NRF_SPIS))
|
||||
|
||||
config HAS_HW_NRF_SPIS120
|
||||
def_bool $(dt_nodelabel_enabled_with_compat,spi120,$(DT_COMPAT_NORDIC_NRF_SPIS))
|
||||
def_bool $(dt_nodelabel_enabled_with_compat,spis120,$(DT_COMPAT_NORDIC_NRF_SPIS))
|
||||
|
||||
config HAS_HW_NRF_SPIS130
|
||||
def_bool $(dt_nodelabel_enabled_with_compat,spi130,$(DT_COMPAT_NORDIC_NRF_SPIS))
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ CHECK_DT_REG(spi134, NRF_SPIM134);
|
|||
CHECK_DT_REG(spi135, NRF_SPIM135);
|
||||
CHECK_DT_REG(spi136, NRF_SPIM136);
|
||||
CHECK_DT_REG(spi137, NRF_SPIM137);
|
||||
CHECK_DT_REG(spis120, NRF_SPIS120);
|
||||
CHECK_DT_REG(spu, NRF_SPU);
|
||||
CHECK_DT_REG(swi0, NRF_SWI0);
|
||||
CHECK_DT_REG(swi1, NRF_SWI1);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue