From bd365cc42e10d235c2712bca919296c46f7cd37f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jennifer Williams Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 18:53:59 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] tests: posix: common: clock.c: rephrase comment on tick alignment This k_usleep(1) is a tick alignment, not a workaround. Simple reword to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Jennifer Williams --- tests/posix/common/src/clock.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/posix/common/src/clock.c b/tests/posix/common/src/clock.c index 4edee7a4200..ee793ffc632 100644 --- a/tests/posix/common/src/clock.c +++ b/tests/posix/common/src/clock.c @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ void test_posix_realtime(void) /* Minimal sleep to align us to the next tick interval. This * helps with a case that 2 consecutive calls to clock_gettime() - * below return different values. Note that it's still a workaround, - * which may break, in which case follow the suggestion in the + * below return different values. Note that the tick alignment + * approach may break, in which case follow the suggestion in the * comment above. */ k_usleep(1);