kernel: have k_sched_lock call _sched_lock
Having two implementations of the same thing is bad, especially when one can just call the other inline version. Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
624a75c76e
commit
9f38d2a91a
2 changed files with 3 additions and 20 deletions
|
@ -239,12 +239,8 @@ static inline int _must_switch_threads(void)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Internal equivalent to k_sched_lock so that it does not incur a function
|
||||
* call penalty in the kernel guts.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Must be kept in sync until the header files are cleaned-up and the
|
||||
* applications have access to the kernel internal deta structures (through
|
||||
* APIs of course).
|
||||
* Called directly by other internal kernel code.
|
||||
* Exposed to applications via k_sched_lock(), which just calls this
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline void _sched_lock(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue