sched: Properly account for timeslicing in tickless mode
When adding a new runnable thread in tickless mode, we need to detect whether it will timeslice with the running thread and reset the timer, otherwise it won't get any CPU time until the next interrupt fires at some indeterminate time in the future. This fixes the specific bug discussed in #7193, but the broader problem of tickless and timeslicing interacting badly remains. The code as it exists needs some rework to avoid all the #ifdef mess. Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6dae106d79
commit
9ecc4ead68
2 changed files with 14 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ void *_get_next_switch_handle(void *interrupted);
|
|||
struct k_thread *_find_first_thread_to_unpend(_wait_q_t *wait_q,
|
||||
struct k_thread *from);
|
||||
void idle(void *a, void *b, void *c);
|
||||
void z_reset_timeslice(void);
|
||||
|
||||
/* find which one is the next thread to run */
|
||||
/* must be called with interrupts locked */
|
||||
|
@ -222,6 +223,10 @@ static inline void _ready_thread(struct k_thread *thread)
|
|||
_add_thread_to_ready_q(thread);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_TICKLESS_KERNEL) && !defined(CONFIG_SMP)
|
||||
z_reset_timeslice();
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
sys_trace_thread_ready(thread);
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue