michaelh/zephyr
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

pm: use actions for device PM control

Browse source 
Instead of passing target states, use actions for device PM control.
Actions represent better the meaning of the callback argument.
Furthermore, they are more future proof as they can be suitable for
other PM actions that have no direct mapping to a state. If we compare
with Linux, we could have a multi-stage suspend/resume. Such scenario
would not have a good mapping when using target states.

Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
This commit is contained in:
Gerard Marull-Paretas 2021-07-05 15:13:40 +02:00 • committed by Anas Nashif
commit 7ccc1a41bc
40 changed files with 176 additions and 145 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
drivers/interrupt_controller/intc_arcv2_irq_unit.c
View file

@ -175,16 +175,16 @@ static int arc_v2_irq_unit_resume(const struct device *dev)
* @return operation result
*/
static int arc_v2_irq_unit_device_ctrl(const struct device *dev,
enum pm_device_state state)
enum pm_device_action action)
{
int ret = 0;
unsigned int key = arch_irq_lock();
switch (state) {
case PM_DEVICE_STATE_SUSPENDED:
switch (action) {
case PM_DEVICE_ACTION_SUSPEND:
ret = arc_v2_irq_unit_suspend(dev);
break;
case PM_DEVICE_STATE_ACTIVE:
case PM_DEVICE_ACTION_RESUME:
ret = arc_v2_irq_unit_resume(dev);
break;
default: