michaelh/zephyr
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

devicetree: remove DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY

Browse source 
Several reviewers agreed that DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(...) was an
undesirable API for the following reasons:

- it's inconsistent with the rest of the DT_NODE_HAS_FOO names
- DT_NODE_HAS_FOO_BAR_BAZ(node) was agreed upon as a shorthand
  for macros which are equivalent to
  DT_NODE_HAS_FOO(node) && DT_NODE_HAS_BAR(node) &&
- DT_NODE_HAS_BAZ(node), and DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY is an odd duck
- DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(..., okay) was viewed as more readable anyway
- it is seen as a somewhat aesthetically challenged name

Replace all users with DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(..., okay), which is
semantically equivalent.

This is mostly done with sed, but a few remaining cases were done by
hand, along with whitespace, docs, and comment changes. These special
cases include the Nordic SOC static assert files.

Signed-off-by: Martí Bolívar <marti.bolivar@nordicsemi.no>
This commit is contained in:
Martí Bolívar 2020-05-11 11:56:08 -07:00 • committed by Carles Cufí
commit 6e8775ff84
184 changed files with 968 additions and 1010 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
drivers/counter/counter_mcux_lptmr.c
View file

@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static const struct counter_driver_api mcux_lptmr_driver_api = {
BUILD_ASSERT(DT_NUM_INST_STATUS_OKAY(DT_DRV_COMPAT) <= 1,
"unsupported lptmr instance");
#if DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(DT_DRV_INST(0))
#if DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(DT_DRV_INST(0), okay)
static struct mcux_lptmr_data mcux_lptmr_data_0;
static void mcux_lptmr_irq_config_0(struct device *dev);
@ -254,4 +254,4 @@ static void mcux_lptmr_irq_config_0(struct device *dev)
mcux_lptmr_isr, DEVICE_GET(mcux_lptmr_0), 0);
irq_enable(DT_INST_IRQN(0));
}
#endif /* DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(DT_DRV_INST(0)) */
#endif /* DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(DT_DRV_INST(0), okay) */