michaelh/zephyr
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

devicetree: remove DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY

Browse source 
Several reviewers agreed that DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(...) was an
undesirable API for the following reasons:

- it's inconsistent with the rest of the DT_NODE_HAS_FOO names
- DT_NODE_HAS_FOO_BAR_BAZ(node) was agreed upon as a shorthand
  for macros which are equivalent to
  DT_NODE_HAS_FOO(node) && DT_NODE_HAS_BAR(node) &&
- DT_NODE_HAS_BAZ(node), and DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY is an odd duck
- DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(..., okay) was viewed as more readable anyway
- it is seen as a somewhat aesthetically challenged name

Replace all users with DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(..., okay), which is
semantically equivalent.

This is mostly done with sed, but a few remaining cases were done by
hand, along with whitespace, docs, and comment changes. These special
cases include the Nordic SOC static assert files.

Signed-off-by: Martí Bolívar <marti.bolivar@nordicsemi.no>
This commit is contained in:
Martí Bolívar 2020-05-11 11:56:08 -07:00 • committed by Carles Cufí
commit 6e8775ff84
184 changed files with 968 additions and 1010 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
boards/arm/dragino_lsn50/pinmux.c
View file

@ -14,11 +14,11 @@
/* pin assignments for Dragino LSN50 board */
static const struct pin_config pinconf[] = {
#if DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(DT_NODELABEL(usart1))
#if DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(DT_NODELABEL(usart1), okay)
{STM32_PIN_PB6, STM32L0_PINMUX_FUNC_PB6_USART1_TX},
{STM32_PIN_PB7, STM32L0_PINMUX_FUNC_PB7_USART1_RX},
#endif
#if DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(DT_NODELABEL(usart2))
#if DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(DT_NODELABEL(usart2), okay)
{STM32_PIN_PA2, STM32L0_PINMUX_FUNC_PA2_USART2_TX},
{STM32_PIN_PA3, STM32L0_PINMUX_FUNC_PA3_USART2_RX},
#endif