devicetree: remove DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY
Several reviewers agreed that DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(...) was an undesirable API for the following reasons: - it's inconsistent with the rest of the DT_NODE_HAS_FOO names - DT_NODE_HAS_FOO_BAR_BAZ(node) was agreed upon as a shorthand for macros which are equivalent to DT_NODE_HAS_FOO(node) && DT_NODE_HAS_BAR(node) && - DT_NODE_HAS_BAZ(node), and DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY is an odd duck - DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(..., okay) was viewed as more readable anyway - it is seen as a somewhat aesthetically challenged name Replace all users with DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(..., okay), which is semantically equivalent. This is mostly done with sed, but a few remaining cases were done by hand, along with whitespace, docs, and comment changes. These special cases include the Nordic SOC static assert files. Signed-off-by: Martí Bolívar <marti.bolivar@nordicsemi.no>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4f16b419e8
commit
6e8775ff84
184 changed files with 968 additions and 1010 deletions
|
@ -14,27 +14,27 @@
|
|||
|
||||
/* pin assignments for 96boards Carbon board */
|
||||
static const struct pin_config pinconf[] = {
|
||||
#if DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(DT_NODELABEL(usart1))
|
||||
#if DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(DT_NODELABEL(usart1), okay)
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PA9, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PA9_USART1_TX},
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PA10, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PA10_USART1_RX},
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#if DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(DT_NODELABEL(usart2))
|
||||
#if DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(DT_NODELABEL(usart2), okay)
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PA2, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PA2_USART2_TX},
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PA3, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PA3_USART2_RX},
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#if DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(DT_NODELABEL(usart6))
|
||||
#if DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(DT_NODELABEL(usart6), okay)
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PC6, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PC6_USART6_TX},
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PC7, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PC7_USART6_RX},
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#if DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(DT_NODELABEL(i2c1))
|
||||
#if DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(DT_NODELABEL(i2c1), okay)
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PB6, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PB6_I2C1_SCL},
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PB7, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PB7_I2C1_SDA},
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#if DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(DT_NODELABEL(i2c2))
|
||||
#if DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(DT_NODELABEL(i2c2), okay)
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PB10, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PB10_I2C2_SCL},
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PB3, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PB3_I2C2_SDA},
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#if DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(DT_NODELABEL(spi1))
|
||||
#if DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(DT_NODELABEL(spi1), okay)
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_STM32_USE_HW_SS
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PA4, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PA4_SPI1_NSS},
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_SPI_STM32_USE_HW_SS */
|
||||
|
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static const struct pin_config pinconf[] = {
|
|||
{STM32_PIN_PA6, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PA6_SPI1_MISO},
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PA7, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PA7_SPI1_MOSI},
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#if DT_HAS_NODE_STATUS_OKAY(DT_NODELABEL(spi2))
|
||||
#if DT_NODE_HAS_STATUS(DT_NODELABEL(spi2), okay)
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_STM32_USE_HW_SS
|
||||
{STM32_PIN_PB12, STM32F4_PINMUX_FUNC_PB12_SPI2_NSS},
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_SPI_STM32_USE_HW_SS */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue