soc: arm: nordic_nrf: nrf91: rename nRF9161 SICA to LACA
This patch corrects the name of the nRF9161, which is LACA, not SICA. Signed-off-by: Maximilian Deubel <maximilian.deubel@nordicsemi.no>
This commit is contained in:
parent
986fb1e85d
commit
4cde3ea70f
9 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions
|
@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
|
|||
# Copyright (c) 2023 Nordic Semiconductor ASA
|
||||
# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
|
||||
|
||||
if SOC_NRF9161_SICA
|
||||
if SOC_NRF9161_LACA
|
||||
|
||||
config SOC
|
||||
default "nRF9161_SICA"
|
||||
default "nRF9161_LACA"
|
||||
|
||||
config NUM_IRQS
|
||||
default 65
|
||||
|
||||
endif # SOC_NRF9161_SICA
|
||||
endif # SOC_NRF9161_LACA
|
|
@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ config SOC_NRF9160_SICA
|
|||
# That's why in the top level of SoC definitions (for user-configurable
|
||||
# options in Kconfig, for example) the nRF9161 term is used and nRF9120
|
||||
# underneath.
|
||||
config SOC_NRF9161_SICA
|
||||
bool "NRF9161_SICA"
|
||||
config SOC_NRF9161_LACA
|
||||
bool "NRF9161_LACA"
|
||||
select SOC_NRF9120
|
||||
|
||||
config SOC_NRF9131_LACA
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue